Foundation vs. Skeleton Css , which is better?

Foundation Logo

Foundation

Foundation is a responsive front-end framework. Foundation provides a responsive grid and HTML and CSS UI components, templates, and code snippets, including typography, forms, buttons, navigation and other interface elements, as well as optional functionality provided by JavaScript extensions. Foundation is maintained by ZURB and is an open source project.

Skeleton Css

As mentioned above, Skeleton is a lightweight CSS framework (or boilerplate, if you prefer this definition) created by Dave Gamache. More specifically, it's two CSS files: the popular normalize.css file and the skeleton.css file.

Skeleton Css

Difference and similar

Price

Foundation

$ 0

Skeleton Css

$0
Developer ZURBDave Gamache
Written in
  • html
  • css
  • javascript
  • sass
  • Css
  • Html
Price $ 0$0
Available language EnglishEnglish
Size 233 KB8.11 KB
Website foundation.zurb.comgetskeleton.com
Responsive YesYes
Modular YesNo
Icon set Foundation Icon FontsNone
CDN cdnjs.com/libraries/foundationcdnjs.com/libraries/skeleton
NPM Pakage npmjs.com/package/foundation-sitesNo
Sass YesNo
Document foundation.zurb.com/sites/docsgetskeleton.com/#intro
Html YesYes
Javascript YesNo
Css YesYes

Foundation vs Skeleton Css reviews

comparman

compargram

@comparman
Foundation

Foundation provides a better environment for website customization. Although it’s possible to customize with Bootstrap, it takes a fair amount of effort to get your site to not look like other Bootstrap sites.

With Foundation, the out-of-the-box CSS design is more of a flat design and looks good right away. And you don’t have to customize too heavily.

Avatar

Thor

@Thor
Skeleton Css

Although Skeleton is usually called a framework, it is largely a boilerplate. There are no extensive components list, nor are there any custom jQuery integrations. You get a simple, no-frills boilerplate that you can later customize.

comparman

compargram

@comparman
Foundation

If you don’t add the correct CSS classes with Bootstrap, effects will not appear.

With Foundation, there are base CSS appearances built in. Some may prefer this, especially since there won’t be as much CSS bloat in your HTML.

comparman

compargram

@comparman
Foundation

Bootstrap’s popularity is like a double-edged sword.

Since many sites use Bootstrap, it can make it easy to tell if a site has been built with Bootstrap. Of course, the last thing you want is a website that looks like everyone else’s.

Because Foundation is less popular, the look is more unique. Bootstrap sites can look cookie-cutter unless extensive customization work is done.

comparman

compargram

@comparman
Foundation

When it comes to extra components and JS extensions, Bootstrap and Foundation are basically head-to-head.

But here are a few extras that Foundation has that Bootstrap does not.

  • Form validation, Abide: HTML5 form validation library
  • Off-canvas menus: Easily place your site navigation off to the side of your site
  • Pricing tables: Ready-to-go table, designed to show prices for a subscription based product
  • Responsive media, Interchange: Website loads different media for different devices/screen sizes, so you can customize the user experience
  • Right-to-left support: Modify the text direction; great for sites in other languages where characters move from right to left
  • Tour, aka Joyride: Give users a tour when they come to your site